THE APPLICATION OF INTELLect ACROSS DISCIPLINES

Gravity does not make sense! It's reasonable to assume that heavier objects should fall faster than lighter ones. When Galileo "soundly" disproved Aristotle's theory it was easy to do because no one had ever tested it before. The followers of Aristotle probably had so much "egg on their face" after "eating crow" that they grew feathers. The logic of that day stood to be as reasonable as the logic of our present day. What was thought to be common sense then, is considered to be irrational now. It was science that disproved the logical superstition of that "day and time." Science is only as solid as the science behind it. The only reason that the world was ever believed to be flat was based on the zeitgeist of that days thinking. When ships failed to fall off the edge of the earth but sailed around it instead, science disproved the logical superstition of that time too. Many of the observations and phenomena processed in our thinking practically, objectively and logically cannot be regarded as conclusive. Although they may fall under some type of theoretical practice or appear to be hypothetically solid they must be scientifically sound or may be regarded as "logical superstition." We must never allow tradition to trump science! Science is the ultimate authority when it is applied scientifically. Science, is a systematic and orderly arrangement of knowledge that synthesizes and provides explanation for seemingly unrelated combinations of thoughts and things. SCIENCE EXPLAINS COINCIDENCE! This definition does not LIMIT science specifically to the physical or material world. The logic applied across various disciplines must be learned to understand and apply. Many common sense logic and accepted traditions have turned out to be "logical superstition" after scientific discovery. This "type" of logic cannot be simply scaled across spiritual or technical disciplines. This is much the same way that common sense logic did not apply to gravity. Galileo had to apply a "​new" logical scientific discipline to explain gravity. Its hard to believe our human condition will not "catch a cold" from exposure to cold weather since we discovered viruses. Does that chain of logic imply that what we do as humans cannot affect our weather's condition? Confused? Just consider this as another way of explaining the uncertainty principle.

---

Correct conclusions are always based upon "a matter of fact."  They fall within an indisputable sphere of certain actual reality. Unfortunately, sometimes a VERSION of an event is highly influenced by the biases of our feelings, beliefs or teachings. A similar scenario  is present with "our intentions." From our intent to however things turn out differs only because the processing and application of the facts were different then originally perceived. Even the most careful considerations may not factor in all of the aspects affecting results. Facts are truth, there are no fake facts. We interpret the meanings of facts through developed reasoning or logic applied across experiences. Computers now manipulate data mined by artificial intelligence for deep learning through multiple means. This also implies that the more experiences we apply our logic to, the more accurate our conclusions should be. As we get older, more experienced and gain more knowledge we should also be getting wiser, smarter and better. When we fail to grow, we mistakenly apply yesterday's thinking to tomorrows problems. We now know that the earth revolves around the sun even though it "appears" that the Sun rotates around the earth. Does it seem reasonable to trust our previous experiences and what we observe rather then science? Is this what Edgar Allan Poe meant when he said, "Believe nothing you hear and only half that you see?"  Let's be clear, the universe is under no obligation to make sense to us.

Do not read any further without clicking on this short film link for YouTube called Alternative Math!  The therapy or practice of principles designed to educate and illuminate our thinking require repeated application, reevaluation and refinement. It is only through the practice of wash, rinse and repeat that we can honestly asses growth or progress. Re-examining and taking second and third looks have moved us from a flat world to exploring space. It is only by questioning things that we can increase our understanding of something and how it relates to anything and everything else. The universe operates scientifically. The "logic" applied to a particular circumstance may not necessarily work across different platforms or situations. Besides questioning things we must first question ourselves and our developed way of thinking and processing results. It is patently foolish to think that yesterdays news makes tomorrows headlines. No one can exercise the same level of nurturing and care maintaining an exclusive relationship that they used in a casual courtship. The kind and amount of energy required for a successful marriage differs from the level of energy needed in that identical type of relationship that produces children. These levels of commitment differ in their types and scope. The results may appear to be the similar but the efforts behind reaching those results came through the principle of applying escalating effort. 

To sum it all up, there are different levels of logic that must be applied to the many different aspects of the universe. There also is a logic that must be followed to understand how to see or apply the multiple types of logic to and across levels. Every essence or substance has a distinct logical science with it. They are all interrelated, sometimes their scientific logic overlaps but most times there are variances. We generally operate off of premises that we've learned over our life time which have worked for us. We tend to fortify those premises by adopting cliches that have a common sense appeal to them. The phrase that says "If it ain't broke don't fix it." promotes complacency above progress. Yet how many of us have resolved situations by simply leaving them alone? Sometimes that method works out but is it really the right thing to do? Advancement calls for addition. To move forward we must be open to change, modification and additional behaviors outside of our comfort zone. Whether we are looking to better our relationships, personal life or career there are fundamental rules for applying our intellect (logic) to properly advance. "Relearning" is possibly more important then "regular learning."  In regular learning we are adding additional information to a already partially completed slate.  In relearning we are focused on how we learn to apply whatever we already know or newly learn. This is in essence an empty slate and a fresh start. Relearning is more about learning how to learn anew outside of the biases, rose colored glasses and other filters we see life through. Change at any level is a choice, then a persistent practice. The practice works the ongoing concept constantly regardless of how any situation seems. The application takes place when the situation which calls for the concept which has been repeatedly practiced is perfectly matched and logically applied to the issue.

---